ETL Blog

Category: Survey Analysis

Going Public with Innovation: Comparing Survey Respondents to All Law Schools and Non-Respondents

Oct
06
2011

This is part three of a series discussing and analyzing the results of a survey sent by Educating Tomorrow's Lawyers to 210 U.S. and Canadian law schools to explore innovations in legal education.

As described in an earlier post, Educating Tomorrow's Lawyers initiated a unique, far-reaching survey of 210 U.S. and Canadian law schools. Now completed, the survey has a 58% response rate. Before presenting the findings in a series of future posts, we face a key prior task – describing the responding schools and seeing how closely they resemble all schools and the non-responding schools. These comparisons are important because they tell us how much confidence we can have in the survey’s findings with regard to patterns and changes in legal education generally. With this in mind we compared schools on a broad array of characteristics: public v. private; part-time v. no part-time (as well as percentage of enrollment part-time for those with such a program);  percent Caucasian enrollment; AALS membership; geographic location; faculty ratio; total enrollment; acceptance rate; median LSAT score; tuition; and rank (based on U.S. News data).  Using these characteristics and commonly accepted statistical tests, the responding schools prove to be quite similar to all schools and no significant differences between the responding and non-responding schools appear.

Read more and view detailed comparisons by downloading the full report.

 

About the Author

Stephen Daniels
Visiting Lecturer, University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Stephen Daniels is a Visiting Lecturer at the University of Denver’s Sturm College of Law and a Senior Research Professor at the American Bar Foundation in Chicago, IL. He was formerly the Director of Research at the University of Denver’s Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System. He holds a Ph.D. in political science from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research focuses on law and public policy and the various aspects of the American civil justice system. He has written on legal services, trial courts, juries, plaintiffs' lawyers, and the politics of civil justice reform – including the areas of medical malpractice, products liability, and punitive damages. He is co-author (with Joanne Martin) of Civil Juries and the Politics of Reform, and author or co-author of numerous articles in law reviews (e.g., Texas Law Review, Minnesota Law Review, Wisconsin Law Review) and social science journals (e.g., Law & Society Review, Law & Policy, Justice System Journal) focusing on law and public policy. He is currently working, with William Sullivan, on a major survey of innovation in legal education.

Add a comment (Or reply to the original entry instead)

Required

Required